this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
692 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 211 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of conservatives think trrmp is a traitor, too.

I mean, they should. The evidence provides.

But they usually think he betrayed the extremes of their bigotries rather than the country and general decency.

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's good news for the coming election. But I still fear he won't ever be punished for his numerous crimes, the biggest yet to come, the pedo rape connections from the Epstein papers.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He's half a billion in the hole and is a historically convicted felon, he's definitely facing consequences. Also, his own zealots are shooting at him.

I want to see what happens with the election from fraud scheme.

My largest concern is the supreme Court granting the President actual immunity.

I keep hearing about some pedophile case with Twermp here, but I don't know what everybody is talking about, did something new come out?

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A judge released the Epstein papers recently, with the names all numbered 'doe', to protect the rich and famous pedophiles from the public eye. Sleuthers on the internet have match trumps movements and actions up to 'doe 174' as most likely as trump. Some suspect the shooter motives might be because of this reason.

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe what I saw was fake but I saw what seemed to be a legal document laying out that Trump and Epstein competed to see who could rape a 12 year old first, and Trump won.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I saw the same document. It was thoroughly disgusting and more or less describes what you said. I'm not making excuses for anyone, but they're also just allegations. I would very much like to see them demonstrated in a court of law, but I don't know that that's really possible at this point.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I thought that was a couple months ago now, but having been hearing a couple specific references and thought there was something new.

Thanks.

[–] hroderic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A judge released some grand jury files from the Epstein case recently, which brought new scrutiny on all the files from different related investigations. Trump is mentioned in many of them and some flight records show he flew on Epstein's plane several times. Apparently nothing that's conclusively incriminating.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I remember that from a little while ago, I've just been hearing so much specific pedo stuff about Trump that I thought there might be something new and more incriminating.

He was accused of raping that 13-year-old on Epstein Island, but even under anonymity her identity was discovered and apparently the woman who brought the suit received so many threats that she withdrew the lawsuit.

So there is an actual case tied to him as well.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

My father, a lifetime Republican before Trump, and still a rather fiscally conservative man, was actually conflicted on whether or it would have been better or worse if Trump had died on that stage. He openly calls the man a Fascist these days.

Trump may be a Republican, but it's actually rather generous to call him a Conservative.

It wouldn't surprise me if someone would think Trump's death might return us to the Conservatism of the past, but I think that's flawed. The Republican party has always been on the wrong side of social politics, and there's no turning back from the stain of fascism on the party.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

The Republican party has always been on the wrong side of social politics

I mean, in 1865 they were pretty OK.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Yea, he's definitely a nominal 'pub, but can't be conservative since he changes his political will constantly.

Twermp is liberally fascist.

Any strategy that will allow him to wield authoritarian power is worthy of pursuit for him.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The shooter was supposedly a fan of history, a history buff. Let's assume the meme about men thinking about the Roman empire was true. The guy might've been a fan of democracy, looked at the fate of the Roman republic, saw the writing on the wall, and decided that he wanted to prevent that, and also make history in some way too.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As weird as it sounds, I believe keeping trump alive is the best bet to win for the Democrats.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Agreed. Right now trump is a flailing baby. If he was dead they could use him as a symbol and say anything they want.