this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
471 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39046 readers
4144 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bankir and his men have been trying to fight off Russian attacks along the Ukrainian front lines for more than two years. But it’s only now that they are finally able to strike where it hurts: Inside Russia’s own territory.

The newly granted permission by the United States and other allies to use Western weapons to strike inside Russia has had a huge impact, Bankir said. “We have destroyed targets inside Russia, which allowed for several successful counteroffensives. The Russian military can no longer feel impunity and security,” the senior officer in Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) told CNN. For security reasons, he asked to be identified by his call sign only.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Putin is waging a war of aggression, for conquest. Nuclear attacks would contaminate the land and reduce its overall value.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Putin is also not suicidal. And he has grandchildren.

He's an absolute monster, but he'd have to be hiding in the bunker with Eva and the German shepherds before he pushed the button.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

or they could go to Argentina and just hang out

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

At this point I don’t understand what he hopes to get out of it and how it could be profitable for him. Everything he might annex is a bombed out wreck and there are no longer the people that ran it. Even the existence of the harbor he wants to be a big naval base again: how could he expect that to ever be safe for the remainder of the fleet?

Even were he to win, he’s starting over with everything. Infrastructure, resources, people. When Ukraine wins, we will (hopefully) help them rebuild, but what is Russia going to do? Take out loans from Bank of China and dig themselves even deeper under a mountain of debt?

[–] Appleseuss@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

He wants the port in Crimea for trade. Russia is a mainly landlocked nation.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

MAD wouldn't be a thing in a first place if it weren't for human spite, and the potential thereof. The ideal rational agents from game theory turn out to ignore it.