this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
381 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
3076 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine has the right under international law to attack military targets located in Russian territory, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said during an interview on the United News telethon July 14.

United States policy prohibits Ukrainian forces from using U.S.-supplied weapons to strike targets deep within Russia. President Volodymyr Zelensky has called on Washington to lift restrictions, saying the ability to use long-range U.S. weapons such as ATACMS within Russia and occupied Crimea would produce "an instant result."

In the interview, Stoltenberg affirmed Ukraine's right to self-defense.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There has been an attempt at a balancing act by USA and Europe, and while Europe has abandoned the idea, USA is keeping it.
The idea is that if Russia lose to much to quickly, it may destabilize Russia, and that could create a dangerous situation with the Russian nukes.
So USA was sort of in a Limbo, that Russia could not be allowed to win, but they couldn't be allowed to lose and be destabilized either.

This idea however is becoming less and less popular in USA, and there is speculation that USA will soon lift these restrictions.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Solution: Here Ukraine, here's some nukes. Finlsnd, you get some nukes too, hey all the baltic states besides Belarus gets nukes!

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, just look at what happens to states without nukes. Gaddafi himself agreed to give up his nukes and how did that turn out for Libya?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No no. I'm not saying those states give up their nukes. As far as I know Ukraine doesn't have any.

I'm saying the USA supply those places nukes to get Putin to calm down.

He's agreeing with you

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sorry, seems to be a misunderstanding, I'm supporting that idea using Libya as a negative example of what bad things can happen when you don't have them. They went from an African Economic powerhouse to an open air slave state all under the orders of a President that won a nobel peace prize.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Ukraine has had nukes before. Maybe this time if the codes aren’t kept in Moscow the attitude will change

[–] diablexical@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)