this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
336 points (83.9% liked)

politics

19239 readers
3756 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No, because Harris does not poll well and leapfrogging her to send Newsom would anger lots of people.

[–] acutfjg@feddit.nl 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Leapfrogging? This isn't some schoolyard game of "it's my turn next". If there's a better candidate who cares who it "leapfrogs".

I don't think it would anger as many as it would help to have a better candidate

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The tradition of succession is still strong in American politics, it's how Biden got the nom.

Look to Hilary and Bernie for a very similar parallel, its tribal but it's true

[–] Five 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is an argument for revolution, not for keeping Biden on the ticket.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Hah, you think Americans will revolt? Oh sweet summer child

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

People wouldn't be mad about the "leapfrogging", nobody gives a shit about that. People don't like Newsom though, I would be shocked if an SF based politician won a presidency.

[–] sparkle@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Even worse, an SF based fiscally conservative corpo-Democrat. This is the same guy who suddenly changed his mind and didn't pass universal healthcare in California when he supported it beforehand (guess being bankrolled by healthcare companies made it harder to sign), I don't think anyone would want that. Also he's just an unlikeable piece of shit, he's what pops into the average person's mind when they think "the elite". His shitty economics seem to have fucked up California quite a bit and he's barely any better than the average libertarian (but unlike the Libertarian party candidate, at least he doesn't want to abolish the Department of Education and all government healthcare, but that's a pretty low bar)

I will commit seppuku before I vote for Newsom. Disclaimer: I am not Californian

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I am Californian and yeah he sucks. He bailed out the local gas and electric companies after they burned down half the state.