this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
172 points (94.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
3488 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A bunch of eighth graders in a "wealthy Philadelphia suburb" recently targeted teachers with an extreme online harassment campaign that The New York Times reported was "the first known group TikTok attack of its kind by middle schoolers on their teachers in the United States."

According to The Times, the Great Valley Middle School students created at least 22 fake accounts impersonating about 20 teachers in offensive ways. The fake accounts portrayed long-time, dedicated teachers sharing "pedophilia innuendo, racist memes," and homophobic posts, as well as posts fabricating "sexual hookups among teachers."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What do you mean with your question? What those students did is slander and mobbing. Those are prosecutable offenses.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Slander is a civil matter, and there is no crime called "mobbing."

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

slander and mobbing. Those are prosecutable offenses.

No they aren't. Slander is a civil tort (not criminal / not prosecutable), and "Mobbing" isn't even a legal term, but to the best of my understanding is synonymous with "assembling", which is constitutionally protected.

At worst, a student could be sued by a teacher, and these are middle schoolers, so it would be the parents being sued.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I think "assembling" in this context refers to collecting personal information about someone with the intend to steal someones identity. So yes, I guess the teachers could maybe sue for identity theft or online impersonation as well even if creating a fake social media profile for someone without their knowledge in itself does not seem to be a crime on a federal level. There seem to be some state laws concerning this tho - in Texas for example that can be a felony if I get this right. But also yes, that should be the parents' problem, since minors are usually not criminally liable.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Identity theft is really only limited to contract law, not social impersonation. This would still be libel / slander.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If so the kids might just got lucky in that regard. There seems to be or at least there was a bill in Pennsylvania that would make online impersonation a crime with a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a 5000$ fine. I assume that this story is likely to fuel the discussion about this bill again, if it has not already been enacted into law yet.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Man they bringin RICO against these kids. “Assembling”. Mobbing someone means attacking them as a group. One of the kids is gonna flip and he’s gonna go life the rest of his life in Timbuktu.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I meant that comment in regard to

I know teachers can be shitty but this is completely uncalled for unless they were actually doing those things

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If they actually did those things, it wouldn’t be slander.

If I were to guess, I’d take it as “unless the kids knew/suspected with good reason they were doing those things”, because that’s how I would feel about it at least. I would still want to talk to them about appropriate responses and make sure they knew they could trust me, but kids don’t always know how to bring up adults’ misbehavior.

If it’s just a fluke, that would feel like an ends justifying the means situation.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It would be harassment whether or not it's true, so the teachers would still have reason to sue.

I just hope something happens with their parents too, because kids who do things like this tend to have shitty parents.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

I’d like to first of all say that I don’t see any reason to believe the teachers did this. I hope the police proceed under that assumption unless evidence leading otherwise turns up. My original comment was about why someone might not want their children punished as severely, if the teachers did in fact do these things to their students, but I don’t think it’s likely (and really hope it’s not the case).

It would be harassment whether or not it's true, so the teachers would still have reason to sue.

That’s true, but it’s probably not a huge concern. Middle schoolers under that kind of pressure will react without thought to consequences and if their most grievous response is to harass their abusers, most courts would probably recognize that. I would still explain to them that they can trust me and that I’ll believe them if they tell me something like this in the future, before it gets to this point.

I just hope something happens with their parents too, because kids who do things like this tend to have shitty parents.

Agreed.