this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
305 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
3466 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Nyquist theorem, in very simple terms, describes the minimum measurements you need to take to capture all the information in a signal. It turns out, if you have special information about what signal you expect to see, you can still figure it out using fewer measurements.

Generally speaking, it tells you how many measurements you need to take to capture the whole signal.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Or in terms of practical applications, it explains why CDs are "good enough" and audiophile stuff is very often bullshit.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Instead of actually explaining it, here's how I like to remember it: If you are measuring something that produces a perfect sine wave, and you can't take measurements faster than 30 Hz, then you can't definitively prove that the sine wave repeats faster than that. No matter how many data points you collect, the actual frequency could always be double what your measurements suggest.