this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
580 points (88.3% liked)

Solarpunk

5492 readers
1 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a post-scarcity solarpunk future, I could imagine some reasonable uses, but that’s not the world we’re living in yet.


AI art has already poisoned the creative environment. I commissioned an artist for my latest solarpunk novel, and they used AI without telling me. I had to scrap that illustration. Then the next person I tried to hire claimed they could do the work without AI but in fact they could not.

All that is to say, fuck generative AI and fuck capitalism!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There's another way for the poor to acquire art for their own comics. Can you guess what it is?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But I will literally die if I don’t get free plagiarized art :(

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You would die (or be out on the street and wish you were dead) if your primary source of income relied on having access to filler art for some purpose and you didn't have thousands of dollars to hire an artist.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do I not have hands in this scenario? If I can't draw why is my livelihood dependent on me making filler art?

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago

Say you're producing an independent film, or a game, or some other work that is multimedia, working on a shoestring budget, and with a limited set of skills.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Barter. Between artists. That kind of collaboration happens all the time and people are deliberately ignoring it so they can justify AI LLM's.

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can guess that you think that everyone who wants to make comics should either have to draw it themself or hire someone to draw it. Just like how you probably would have thought that anyone who wants a shirt should weave it themself or hire a hand weaver.

People will always create new and better machines to automate away what they don't want to do. Similarly, there will always be people who are upset about this. It's an age-old story. You can accept the times or try to prevent an avalanche with your body, but that snow doesn't care at all about your favorite little patch of land. It's doing its thing regardless.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Environmentally speaking, people should probably learn to sew and not be overly reliant on unsustainable mechanisation.

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and they should probably not use cars, or plastics, or make spaceships, or airplanes, or smart phones, or beanie babies. They shouldn't farm or hunt more than they need. They shouldn't make medicines either. They should do none of these things if preserving the environment is the number one concern. The issue is that there are billions of years of evolution driving us to explore and conquer, to learn and manipulate our surroundings, to do anything we can to stay alive and keep our lived ones alive. That couple billion years absolutely annihilates any vague notion of preserving the environment. I'm not saying it's a better idea, just that people are restless by design us all curling up into little balls and having minimal impact on the environment simply isn't going to happen unless something massively limits us.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If only there was some kind of compromise between "drawing comics and sewing clothes" and "burn down the entire amazon rainforest to generate apes"