this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
391 points (87.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What kind of head in the sand, wishy-washy troglodyte is undecided for this election? We've already had 4 years of each, with 24 hour news coverage for literally everything they do.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

According to this recent study, young people who want a more progressive option

"A majority (60%) think the U.S. should increase spending on social programs and increase taxes on businesses and wealthy Americans.

This survey finds no evidence that a rightward ideological shift would solve Biden’s problems with swing voters. Swing voters broadly think Biden needs to take more action to solve our country's problems and broadly lean left on economic and social issues. Only 16% say that Biden being “too liberal” is a reason they might not vote for him.

The top two issues swing voters select as actions that would make them definitely vote for Biden are raising taxes on the wealthy (23%) and raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour (18%)."

https://www.dataforprogress.org/insights/2024/5/30/measuring-the-swing-evaluating-the-key-voters-of-2024

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Young people are fucking stupid then if they think trump gets them anywhere nearer their goals.

Source- I was a dumb youth in my day. Vote for the car that gets you closest to your destination, not farther away from it. And definitely don't abstain and then complain after the fact that things are worse.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think a lot of voters of every age vote against their own interests.

I mean honestly it's hard to imagine that a Trump presidency would be good for anyone who is not either part of the Trump family or already very wealthy.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Both are very true... I wish the DNC was willing to do whatever it takes to defeat him, even if that means going with a progressive candidate

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

The DNC needs to accept that this is the group they need to go after... And accept it for what it is, not think they're magically going to change... Convince Biden to drop out and nominate a progressive if they want to win.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suppose that would make sense. Trump doubled down on tax cuts for the wealthy and burning the hell out of fossil fuels. So even if someone were oblivious to his lying, and Trump was able to "perform" more confidently, the end result were policies with grave implications. Also, on the one weak point with progressives, falling to protect Palestinians, Trump's criticism was that Biden wasn't pro Israel hard enough...

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"One weak point" as in progressive's only weak argument, or as in the only thing Biden is weak on that they want?

Because there are quite a few other things Biden is weak on that progressives want.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Perhaps an oversimplification, but I'd say it's the one point that progressives are so pissed that they would tend to forget that the other likely choice would rather see more genocide. On other points I'd say progressives may wish for better, but are willing to be more pragmatic for now.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's too bad those voters never show up.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

They show up more than millennials, x, or boomers did at that age

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

According to this recent study, young people who want a more progressive option

I mean I know the young are generally ignorant by the simple fact of their age and lack of experience, but in what universe do they think that's an option? Maybe like 2 years ago we could have pushed for something, but now? It's Trump or Biden. Being undecided is just saying you don't know which of those two you would vote for, any other vote is just a vote for the person you like least to win.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

The Dems could still push Biden to drop out and replace him with someone who might actually have a chance

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Generously, people who were 14-16yo when Trump’s first term ended and weren’t fully aware of what was going on at the time.

Realistically, a large portion of ‘mainstream’ Republicans embarrassed by what the GOP has become - but still not certain if they can go against decades of Fox News programming and vote for a shudders Democrat.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

New voters who never cared about politics previously, and may have just started paying attention when they to college and realized everyone there does. There's a precedent for that being the case at least heh

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like this implies the youth vote matters anywhere, and the one thing we all know is young people don't vote.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why all these college campuses have had protests. They don't care.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That's not something new, young people traditionally have strong political opinions and fail to turn out for elections. Even in presidential elections, which are the highest turnout for the demographic, you're looking at maybe 40% in the standard year. Turnout was better during COVID when tensions were high and there was a lot of momentum to get Trump out, but even then it was in the realm of~50%.