this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
776 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11047 readers
3152 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jas0n@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (4 children)

All aboard the hype train! We need to stop using the term "AI" for advanced auto complete. There is not even a shred of intelligence in this. I know many of the people here already know this, but how do we get this message to journalists?! The amount of hype being repeated by respectable journalists is sickening.

[–] Ashen44@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

people have been calling literal pathfinding algorithms in video games AI for decades. This is what AI is now and I think it's going to be significantly easier to just accept this and clarify when talking about actual intelligence than trying to fight the already established language.

[–] jas0n@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

While you're not wrong, I don't ever recall people en masse believing a game AI was truly intelligent. Everyone was always aware of the truth. There just isn't a great name for the computer players. I think it's an important distinction here because people do believe ChatGPT is intelligent.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Too late, the journalists have been replaced by advanced auto completes already.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If you can be replaced by advanced autocomplete, you're not really a "journalist"

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev -2 points 4 months ago

Well, the “journalists” have not been replaced. But most of the content creating industry were not really that and have, as you say, started to be replaced.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

My organic neural network (brain) > yours (smooth brain)

I jest

I know many of the people here already know this, but how do we get this message to journalists?!

Journalists have this information, but articles about it probably generate 10% of the clicks, shares and eyeballs->ad revenue that either the hype or the scaremongering does.