this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
276 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
5184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
276
Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 2 months ago by jwr1@kbin.earth to c/technology@lemmy.world
123 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised some marketing genius at the intel/amd hasnt started using the bigger numbers

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I expect the engineers are telling the marketing people "No! You can't do that. You'll scare everyone that it's incompatible."

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

32bits is compatible with 64bits, why wouldn't 128 bits be too?

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

64bit cut out 16bit compatibility. So I'm guessing the fear is that 128 would cut 32.