this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

AskBeehaw

2002 readers
2 users here now

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.

Subcommunity of Chat

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
thrawn21@beehaw.org
UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org
3
What is unnecessary gendered? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago by Idrunkenlysignedup@beehaw.org to c/askbeehaw@beehaw.org
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was watching pro golf coverage on the news and it seems so odd that men and women compete separately - same goes with pro bowling. Just seems weird to me that a game of skill is gendered when you can't even raise an argument that someone might have an advantage because of what's between their legs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArtZuron@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans IMO. Is there actually a widespread benefit to forcibly upholding the gender roles? I can tell you about 100 cons. Let people be what they want. It shouldn't be forced upon others. It's easier to just not bother.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is there actually a widespread benefit to forcibly upholding the gender roles?

it's complicated but given that they're a near-universal phenomenon (despite what those roles are not being universal), i do think it logically follows that humans collectively derive some social value from their continuation―although i think opinions would vary heavily on what that social value is. in any case it doesn't seem likely we'd spontaneously invent and almost universally adopt a social construct with no intrinsic benefits.