Technology

59197 readers

2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

858

Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court win (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that’s the appropriate scope as well, I’m just sad that we’ve let the laws get away from us.

I don't.

You are right in the sense that it all comes down to the society having such laws or not having them (as in rioting till something changes?).

But in the sense of forces nudging these laws in one or another direction, anything that causes a constant one-sided drift when left to usual laws should be moved to constitutional ones.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only difference in the US code vs the Constitution is the difficulty of passing or revoking them, and we've done both (alcohol prohibition). That cuts both ways. Progressives will decry the 2A, and conservatives seem to hate the 14A, and both seem to hate the 1A (at least the speech bit).

What we should instead do is adjust the barrier to passing laws. It should reaquire 60% in the Senate to block a House bill, and it should pass with 40% support. Perhaps 60% should be required for the house as well, idk. There should also be limitations on the content of bills, so fewer omnibis bills and more smaller bills (one idea is to force legislators to swear under oath that they understand the bill). That should allow popular legislation to make it through easier.

Regardless, we need to overhaul our IP laws and return them to their original purpose: helping smaller creators to compete against larger players.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

There should also be limitations on the content of bills, so fewer omnibis bills and more smaller bills (one idea is to force legislators to swear under oath that they understand the bill). That should allow popular legislation to make it through easier.

That is the hardest problem to solve fundamentally IMHO. The package bills.

Which is why some people give up (or lose their mind) and become 'sovereign citizens" or ancaps.