this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
74 points (85.6% liked)

Casual Conversation

1477 readers
191 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As video games develop more and more over the years, companies have been making them more and more realistic-looking. I can guess this is related to expectations, but am I the only one who doesn't care about graphics? We could be using the same processing power to store worlds that have as much exploration potential as the Earth itself if we weren't afraid to save on processing power by going back to 8-bit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moody@lemmings.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And because resources are finite, all else isn’t held equal. You’re giving up time spent working on gameplay or whatever to stick fancier graphic assets in.

That's not how game design works. The people who work on the gameplay and level design and dialog are not the same people who work on the graphics. Sure, making the game prettier takes more time, but it has no effect on how long the rest of the game takes to be built. And lower-quality assets can be used in the interim for things like scripting animations, with higher quality assets swapped in later.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Sure, the same people can't work on the different aspects, but budget for more designers who spend longer making more detailed graphics could be spent on other departments that do affect gameplay.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

You could hire more game devs if that money wasn't spent on excessive prettiness.

And keep in mind, there's as much cost in an organization for management overhead, if not more.