this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
381 points (91.1% liked)

tumblr

3372 readers
221 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A party that collapses is one people don't keep voting for. So we will see if the Democratic Party will collapse before changing policies.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Democratic party changes policies all the time. Already, a majority of Democrats want us to stop supporting Israel, and Biden has even held up weapons shipments to Israel and started negotiating directly with Hamas. I'd expect more in that direction in the future.

Gay marriage is a huge one. The Dems changed policies on that in an incredibly short period of time, during the Obama administration.

Went from "yeah let's invade Iraq and stop Saddam!" to "oh man we made a mistake"

Went from "we need to support workers" to "we need to support business" and now back to "we need to support workers" again over 40 years

Y'all need to understand that the Democratic party listens to it's voters. Leftists don't represent the whole party, in fact they're an unreliable fringe group and it's debatable whether to group them with the Democrats at all.

The DNC doesn't particularly worry about the Leftist vote, the youth vote, etc because y'all are unreliable as fuck. The DNC cares about lower middle class mid-30s women. The DNC cares about Black single mothers. The DNC cares about highly educated city-dwelling white men. Blocs that fucking vote.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Went from "yeah let's invade Iraq and stop Saddam!" to "oh man we made a mistake"

Oof.

The change in Israeli policy, accepting gay marriage, rejecting iraq invasion, and support for labor rights... Where and how did the Democratic Party arrive at these positions?

There was a short period of time when the Democratic Party pursued a strategy that involved more than those specific named categories. Howard Dean, another Vermont progressive, ran the DNC from 2005-2009 and helped facilitate Obama's victory in deep red stated and even a dominating congressional position.

He was removed in 2009. The Democrats have been stringing along some hefty Ls since, even though a progressive, leftist strategy was proven to work.

The faction that beat away Dean is the same that undermined Sanders twice.

https://www.politico.com/story/2009/12/what-if-obama-hadnt-ostracized-dean-030752

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Where and how did the Democratic Party arrive at these positions?

That's an extremely complicated question to answer, but I'm sure you have some simple-sounding conspiracy theory that ties everything together neatly if you don't look too deeply into it. Let's hear it.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Finish reading the post you're quoting...?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess I haven't drank enough kool-aid to tie together Howard Dean, Bernie Sanders, and the several examples of Democrats changing positions that I mentioned.

But I'll guess it somehow involves the big bad ~~Deep State~~ DNC intentionally sabotaging the glorious majority of Leftist voters who would otherwise dominate political discourse, because they're just that fucking evil or something.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well there is this whole extremely dismissive arrogance kind of thing, but I'm not sure I would call it evil?

See I was only going for the corporate donor backlash over and during the ACA legislation and the effects of the Citizens United/SpeechNow decisions that came thereafter.

It's clear that's all too much to get into, unfortunately, what with all the contempt.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

So super pacs? Influencing the DNC to ignore progressives?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You don’t understand. There won’t be free and fair elections if everyone, not just the core constituencies, everyone doesn’t get out and vote Biden.

Or maybe you understand exactly and you don’t give a crap for, let’s say, reasons.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

I mean yeah that is the threat posed.

Now one might think that a political party is more than the office of the president, and if that election is the only one that matters then the freedom and fairness of elections probably aren't as prominent as once thought.

The entire House, 20+ Democratic senators, and a dozen Democratic governors are up for election this year, and they're having to contend with their party platform. Biden's campaign and the whole rhetoric of not being Trump to beat Trump does not extend beyond the presidential ticket. It is acting as a dead weight for the entire party.

Keeping control of Congress should be a bit more important to the conversation because we are facing down a filibuster, if not veto proof GOP Congress.