Technology

59436 readers

3056 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-66

Artificial Superintelligence Could Arrive by 2027, Scientist Predicts (futurism.com)

submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, theoretically, yes.

I mean, it could be that some guy in his basement has been working on it in total secrecy and it shows up tomorrow.

But my guess is that the likely timeline is further out than either.

I seriously doubt that what we're going to see is a single "Eureka" moment that gives us both AGI and manages to greatly surpass humans.

I would expect to see a more-incremental process, where publicly-visible systems get closer and closer to approaching that. And what OpenAI and friends are doing isn't close. It's cool, is useful for a lot of things, but isn't a generalized system for solving problems.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Exactly. If you look at timelines for significant human achievement, you'll think innovation comes in waves. But if you zoom in a bit, it's really a bunch of ripples leading to pretty steady innovation.

For example, EVs exploded with Tesla, but they've been around for decades, they just didn't catch on. The innovation to get there was steady, but the adoption was quick once a viable product was available and marketed well.

The same is true for AI. I learned about generative AI in college over a decade ago, and the source material was also old (IIRC the old lisp machines were supposed to be used for AI). It exploded because it got just good enough to be viable, and it was marketed well. The actual innovation was quite gradual.