While I think that’s dope it does feel like it gives Russia valid cause to strike them in host countries and kind of feels like a deliberate provocation to do so?

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (18 children)

Russia doesn’t actually want NATO get involved so they wouldn’t strike the host nation.

load more comments (18 replies)

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Russia already stated that they will do precisely that, so this moves us one step closer to a nuclear holocaust. Hope it was worth it.

[–] sweng@programming.dev 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Russia has stated many things they will do, but haven't then actually done. Why would this time be different? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_lines_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago (71 children)

Pretty much none of those were actually stated by Russia. The trend has been that it's the west that make up these red lines, then crosses them and says, see nothing happened. Last I checked, the actual red line Russia set out was Ukraine joining NATO, and when that red line was ignored the war started. This notion that you can just keep pushing a nuclear superpower and nothing bad will happen is imbecilic beyond belief.

load more comments (71 replies)

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This comment is for anyone who is experiencing nuclear-phobia, kinda like I do, to which I strictly mean living with a state of fear or dread about a nuclear apocalypse, this development does puts the world one step closer. It's okay to be scared by that, I know I am. It doesn't mean the world is one step away from a nuclear apocalypse. The world has been closer to the brink of nuclear war before and we're all still here. It's okay to breathe.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)