this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
24 points (85.3% liked)

Technology

34870 readers
6 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Theoretical max for Wi-Fi in the 60GHz spectrum in 7G/s. Theoretical max for Li-Fi is 228G/s. Of course, no one is hitting those maxes now but in general Li-Fi is about 10x faster in the real world, or at least is you have the right prototype equipment.

Physics reason- LiFi uses shorter wavelengths so can switch faster.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so if we get to GammaFi we can be even faster

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

And penetrate walls much better.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you, that makes sense. So the downside is you need line of sight and no interfering light sources?

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. I wouldn’t worry too much about interference from other light sources, as they are likely to be basically steady and not modulating.