this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
341 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3023 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You do realize that’s exactly what Wegovy is, right? Ozempic was being prescribed off-label for weight loss so much, it was severely impacting supply for diabetics who needed it to manage their diabetes. They put the drug through a second round of FDA testing to get approval as a weight loss drug.

And, as someone taking Wegovy for weight loss… it’s no shortcut. It absolutely makes it easier to control your appetite but the side effects are non-trivial. I’ve struggled with my weight my entire life and I feel lucky I wasn’t heavier when I started, but before this I’ve been anywhere between 235 and 320 up and down for the last 15 years. This medication makes me feel, finally, like I’ve got a shot at losing the weight and getting it to a safe level.

Now… if you’re talking about the people who want to take it for 2 months to lose some vanity weight before beach season… I absolutely agree.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I am specifically talking about the massive surge in people using it to shed vanity weight. I completely agree it has legitimate weight management uses and I’m glad it’s helped you.

[–] zigmus64@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Cool. It’s been helpful, but hot damn… if you don’t pay for it occasionally if you eat the wrong thing…

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How did you approach your doctor about it? I'm in the same boat.

I've been thinking about getting it but I didn't want to rush in case there are side affects they find out about.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

It's very common for people who are obese to have prediabetic A1C levels show up in their blood work.

There are absolutely side effects and they're different for different people but some common short term ones are nausea, vomiting, gassiness, stomach discomfort, and fatigue.

It's still worth it for a lot of people.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I asked mine kinda like "whats the deal with these new medications?" Explaining I knew only a bit about the difference between the two, higher dose weight-loss (wegovy) VS. meant for diabetics (ozempic).

The poor soul in the waiting room behind me.. Must have waited 30 minutes beyond the initial appointment because my doctor was so ~~excited~~ passionate about what these drugs can help with. He talked about a full hour about it.

My takeaways (I'm not a doctor or with a perfect memory, so I might get this a little wrong):

He somewhat likened our 'automation systems' in the brain to can't being able to discern between 'starvation mode' and 'plentiful bounty of food' mode. So starving yourself for example to lose weight can still chemically cause your body to 'hold' weight for example; sensing that you're at threat of death if it continues for an extended time. Likewise when food is abundant, it can still hold weight because it's protecting you from future potential death by starvation. These changes are not something we can consciously control for good reason. Imagine you can stop your own heart with a thought.

I'm sure there is much more to it, but this 'automation system' in the brain sticks out.

Lastly, he said that if we wait a bit there will be competing drugs and 'older version' of these new drugs which become out of patent.. And cheaper. So I'll go talk to him in the autumn for a refresher and update.

[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To your last point, according to Hari, generics for semaglutide should be available in 2032.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For that drug yes. He did mention that there was something older, which these new ones are based on, which are coming out of patent. I believe it was liraglutide (victoza). Still seems to require daily injections I believe 😑 but for people who may need this, it's maybe worth it. I used to take daily injections for allergies (slowly strengthened over time) and others get it for diabetes anyway. especially if it is cheaper and with generics.

[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ah yeah, I know what you're referring to, and yes I think you're right, it's daily and I don't think as effective but when your options are limited by insert rant about US "healthcare" here probably better than nothing.