this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
204 points (97.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43942 readers
522 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Give us the cheat codes to your industry/place of work!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is a new risk I'm just hearing about. Do they not configure them strictly enough?

[โ€“] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

ISP security is clown shoes at times. I was reading a blog post of a dude who played with their ISP APIs and was able to make changes to his own router because authenticated API endpoints returned data unauthenticated multiple times because they could just send the same request multiple times until it returned data. They fixed it quick, but still ....

https://samcurry.net/hacking-millions-of-modems

[โ€“] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

A Relevant YouTube video was just posted a few hours ago about this by LowLevelLearning.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's fascinating how these guys think. There's so much inferring what might have been done behind closed doors, and correctly.

I'm also surprised that one of these threat-detection things people talk about wasn't triggered when he was literally sending "123456789" in most of the fields of a request.

[โ€“] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I'm also surprised that one of these threat-detection things people talk about wasn't triggered when he was literally sending with "123456789" in most of the fields of a request.

Considering their systems allowed data return just because they got asked repeatedly, I'm not surprised at all. You'd be surprised the seemingly important metrics that don't get monitored and reported on during day to day operations.