this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
605 points (98.7% liked)

memes

10310 readers
2370 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if this was copyrighted, now imagine a million things even more trivial than this were copyrighted. That is the current state of affairs with copyrights and patents in tech

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

~~It is copyrighted lol. That's why you don't see that specific design much anymore.~~ I was sure I read somewhere that the design was in copyright hell, which is why it isn't used anymore. Looks like I'm wrong.

Edit: actually, after looking more into this guy, the design is public domain. He made a whopping $45 off the design while others have made millions.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's how it usually goes, one person works and creates something, then some other person makes a shitton of money off of it

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The people who argue against copyright need to understand that one of the functions of copyright is to prevent companies with deep pockets from taking the profits you deserve for your hard work.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

"people who argue against copyright" tend to be pretty well informed on the history of it, and aware of the way it's used today. Generally, they argue that it is not performing that function, and may often work the other way around.

[–] BuckenBerry@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

One of the advantages of copyleft, shame the only people who only know about it are the weirdos who use Lemmy.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not sure how official "copyleft" is, but it reads like the creative commons licence which which falls under copyright.

So yes, one of the advantages, and explicit purposes, of copyright is that you get to maintain control of how your intellectual property is used.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 1 points 5 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Smiley_Company

I think this is the company that owns or owned some trademarks related to a smiley face.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Pretty easy to imagine. The smiley face is copyrighted.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that's their point.