this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

Australian Politics

1271 readers
14 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This bit resonated.

It makes me so terribly sad that in a society such as ours the wealthy keep creating new means to harm the less lucky.

That aside, Alan Kholer has also opined in the past that our economics policy is based on disdain.

I know many will read my financial experiences and see failure. I haven't failed; I succeeded when the odds were totally stacked against me. I made good what life threw at me. I survived … with my values intact.

I can only agree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like you're arguing for the sake of arguing. Nothing you're saying makes sense beyond being contrite.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

no I'm arguing against the eugenics-based thought-terminating cliche that "poor people are poor because they have children" which is a nonsense.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

How is it nonsense? You have a certain earning potential. If you choose to have 7 children, you both limit your earning potential due to the time investment of breeding and the need to spread your available income over more dependants. This isn't some class warfare shit. Rich people can afford to have more children because they're rich. We don't start on a level playing field. There are exceptions of course but they are exactly that - exceptions.