this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
118 points (96.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
1049 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They never tell you enough on the statistics on the news to actually get much solid info. Like sample size, error bars, did they fit a particular distribution, what was tossed as outliers and more.

I always think about the chance of rain report and the different explanations of what it might mean (I don't recall which is correct, but it illustrates how confusing it can be) :

Chance of rain today based on a predictive model

Is different from

It WILL rain today in this region and this percent of land area will get rain

Is different from

Over all the historical data for this region, we got rain on this percent of days when the conditions were "the same" in the past.

But all can be reasonably said to be 59% chance of rain today.

[โ€“] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. But part of the reason why they never report the numbers is that most of the readers don't understand them anyway.

And a lot of the time it is not even just complex studies people don't understand. There are also those who can't even judge the magnitude of numbers, e.g. when it comes to spending or the magnitude of percentages (e.g. that 25000 occurrences of a minor crime in a year is not a lot if the country has dozens of millions of inhabitants)

[โ€“] charles@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does vary from place to place but in North America at least, most often it's that it will rain in __% of the land area.

Additionally, I would add that knowing about statistics at least allows you to understand that without that additional info, any stat is essentially meaningless, or at least easily misleading.

[โ€“] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

That is true, I just think it might be hard for many people to understand.