220
Misinformation works, and a handful of social 'supersharers' sent 80% of it in 2020
(techcrunch.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
220 points (99.1% liked)
politics
19097 readers
3965 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just go look at all the tankie fake news yugthos posts over on lemmygrad.ml for a taste of how that works with Lemmy.
Yep, lemmy isn't even immune to it. There's only something like 34k MAU on this side of the fediverse yet we're still under a constant barrage of misinformation. politics@lemmy.world isn't any better than reddit's r/politics in that regard. The mods here, if I'm being generous with my interpretation, labor under the same misguided sense of "impartiality" that allows misinformation to thrive there.
We've got one user posting anti-Biden nonsense 24/7 while tossing in just enough "actual" news for plausible deniability... And it works. I don't even have to name any names, if you've been on lemmy for the last year and paying attention to political subs, I guarantee you already know who I'm referring to.
Lol. Just block Ozma already. I did and I don't miss it.
Oh I did that months ago. But I’m not gonna shy away from calling out active propagandists spreading misinformation and the mods for allowing it.
Both those guys are banned instance-wide on the instance I run.
Disinfo research was a hobby of mine for a few years so I have zero tolerance for it.
IMO getting a bit into the psychology of why people want to believe this crap is pretty key. Narcissism, cognitive bias...
Check this out https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon. Go into the 'sources' folder and start clicking around. A lot of the disinfo sites are in separate files but https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/blob/master/sources/default.txt contains most of them in a big disorganized pile.
Also take a look at https://www.reddit.com/r/QAnonCasualties/ to understand the human cost at the individual & family level.
Google "Alt-right pipeline" to learn about how they've intentionally crafted a radicalization process. Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55t6eryY3g.
Thanks man! This is helpful.
When we talked last, I was talking about the social aspects (crudely understood) of it all - have general mistrust of experts, poor life situation, feelings of, or acutal, social isolation -> find people who seem to have a privileged knowledge others don't that you agree with, make them your tribe -> have a position in a social group, slowly introducing you to more and more outlandish ideas -> repeat points to recruit others to the tribe and signal social value to said.
So agree totally with learning about how this stuff works from psychology and human weakness POV being a vital starting point. Appreciate it!
Yeah that's pretty much it. Then that gets amplified by recommendation algorithms and toxic social media ecosystems, of course.