Funny: Home of the Haha

5650 readers

845 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp@lemmy.world

972

We would've been fooled (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s highly misleading.

The difference is not caused by the focal length but by the distance of the subject from the camera. The only difference between a longer and shorter lens is the field of view. To get the same framing with a 24mm and 200mm you need to be at different distances, but that doesn’t mean the focal length causes the different look. If you took a photo with the 24mm from the same distance as the 200mm and you cropped it so the framing is the same, they would look identical.

Here is a video demonstrating this