this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
170 points (91.7% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3123 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Aid workers fear a new disaster as militia forces close in on a major Darfur city.

On a sunny April afternoon in 2006, thousands of people flocked to the National Mall in Washington, D.C., for a rally with celebrities, Olympic athletes, and rising political stars. Their cause: garner international support to halt a genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region.

“If we care, the world will care. If we act, then the world will follow,” Barack Obama, then the junior Illinois senator, told the crowd, speaking alongside future House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. That same week, then-Sen. Joe Biden introduced a bill in Congress calling on NATO to intervene to halt the genocide in Sudan. “We need to take action on both a military and diplomatic front to end the conflict,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The United Nations has been reporting the famine and war crimes in Sudan for decades.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I hate to say it but it's been going on for too long, most people don't care anymore. New conflicts have taken the spotlight.

[–] livus@kbin.social 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't really explain it, I mean the underlying Palestine/Israel thing has been going on for decades too.

The current Sudanese Civil War has only been going on for 6 months longer than the current Israel vs Gaza hostilities.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Thats an easy one, America isn't openly funding the side committing genocide and threatening to liberate anyone who doesn't like what they do back into the stone age, in Sudan.

Its really not hard to see, if you're prepared to see it.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

Definitely. The US isn't likely to like either side given one of them is tight with Iran and the other one has dealings with Russian mercenaries.

[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The Israel/Palestine thing has been going on for thousands of years, lol. Literally.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Israel didnt exist for about 1900 out of the last 2000 years...

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No one here has been hearing about it in the news for hundreds of years tho (unless some of you are undead/vampires).

Arguably the roots of the Sudan conflict go back to the 1300s.

But in both cases the modern nation-state conflicts kicked off after the colonization of the 19th centuries, and in both cases most of us have been aware of it for decades.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

and in both cases most of us have been aware of it for decades.

As an American, I can tell you that is not at all true about Sudan here, sadly.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Is it naive of me to think American news must have at least reported on the international intervention into the 2004-2005 genocide?

And the separation of Sudan into two countries in 2011? Those were both pretty big; I thought that would be why the person above was calling this an old conflict.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I think it was more reported in News, not news. Actual News has been getting harder and harder to find as “news” providers shift toward entertainment or outrage. If it doesn’t drive clicks, it’s not worth the cost. Not many people go far out of their way to find actual News

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

US news absolutely did but all i remember is that early YouTuber who made sweet hiphop remixes of Bush speeches

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It reported on it sparingly and not with enough detail to make it clear about the history of the region. And it certainly hasn't been in the news since, so it's out of the national consciousness at this point. Many people alive today were too young to even remember that genocide. I was in my late twenties and I'm not young.

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Boston Legal did an episode about in 2005, as a non-American that's all I know about the media coverage in the US. But that should have been seen by at least 2 million people. Plus reruns.