this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
303 points (95.2% liked)

memes

10693 readers
2663 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website
303
New Doomsday Clock just dropped (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by ummthatguy@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I genuinely hope this isn't a hot take for anyone here: Social Darwinism is a dumb and destructive ideology and Idiocracy betrays some pretty awful beliefs.

Which is weird because KOTH and Silicon Valley aren't like that.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Didn't the studio take a pretty heavy hand to it? I feel like I've heard that Mike Judge isn't a huge fan of it.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is where Idiocracy comes from, it was pretty heavily adapted, but might account for any difference in undertones.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/51233/51233-h/51233-h.htm

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

The original has the guy they resurrected enact a genocide on the 99% of humanity who'd been tainted by dumb genes.

And I mean I'm glad Idiocracy didn't end that way, but it's weird that the original accepts the premise of nazi eugenics, but their only issue seems to be the way it was enacted.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Honestly I don't think it's hamful if we set boundaries properly.

You CAN assume:

  1. Dumb people can populate faster.
  2. Many generations of lacking natural predators causes societal decline.

You CANNOT assume:

  1. That one human can judge another on the basis of intellectual capacity.
  2. That the solution to the problem in any way involves untimely death in any amount.