this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
71 points (86.6% liked)
Technology
59298 readers
4665 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, with the right tools they already are. I prefer compact and waterproof design over an easily replaceable battery.
That's the point, it is so you don't have to require any special tools that you have to purchase or rent, or having to deal with glue and all that crap.
You think because it's replaceable it can't be compact and waterproof? Ever used a watch?
A more current example before you complain that no one uses watches now and only smartwatches is an AirTag from ~~cr~~Apple, they are waterproof, compact, and the battery is replaceable without any tools.
That's not the point. The point is reduce electronic waste and improve lithium recovery. The regulations have the following provisions for replaceable batteries
Addition provision for waterproofing also may apply
So basically most companies will opt either provide the tools for free like some already do or just claim that watches and headphones undergo enough contact with sweat and oils that apply for the derogation
But Why? If I switch the battery in my phone once after like 2-3 years, I can deal with that once just fine.
Ye, both watches and airtags have fairly small and round openings to seal up. Also airtags are only ip67, phones are ip68 which is a lot more difficult to achieve.
With a phone, you will then need to separate the battery from the rest of the phone, with some form of "compartment", that will use quite a lot of internal space and therefore make the packaging a lot worse, resulting in a smaller battery. You will then need some form of lid on the back that can be opened / closed again, and is still waterproof to ip68 or more. That requires a lot of pressure on quite complicated seals, with a copmlicated mechanism to hold the lid closed all around the edge. All of this will at least triple the cost of the phone case, which is already a very expensive point on the bom.
People complain phones are too expensive, but then they ask for uneccesary stuff like this...
Unnecessary stuff like waterproofing a phone? Yeah I agree.
User replaceable battery =/= not water proof
Louis Rossman did a video on this: https://odysee.com/@rossmanngroup:a/eu-votes-to-mandate-removable-batteries:7