this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
657 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59168 readers
2133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even if they accept patches, contributing still sounds like a bad deal. It's free labor for some company. FOSS at minimum means the right to fork, precisely what "source available" seeks to deny.

Leaving aside the question of winamp vs comparable programs, does anyone even care about desktop music players any more? I'm a throwback and use command line players, but I thought the cool kids these days use phones for stuff like that.

I understand there is some technical obstacle to porting Rockbox to Android, but idk what it is and haven't tried to look into it.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I look at 'source available' software as the right to review the code yourself to ensure there's no malicious behavior, not for community development.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

You mean if you build it yourself? I guess that is something, but it is still conceivable to sneak stuff in. Look at that xzlib backdoor from a few weeks ago.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Is there any way to verify that the product in deployment is built from the same source? I'm guessing hash values but I still think it can be faked.