this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
407 points (98.8% liked)

Antiwork

500 readers
2 users here now

For the abolition of work. Yes really, abolish work! Not "reform work" but the destruction of work as a separate field of human activity.

To save the world, we're going to have to stop working! — David Graeber

A strange delusion possesses the working classes of the nations where capitalist civilization holds its sway. ...the love of work... Instead of opposing this mental aberration, the priests, the economists, and the moralists have cast a sacred halo over work. — Paul Lafargue

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. — Karl Marx

In the glorification of 'work', in the unwearied talk of the 'blessing of work', I see the same covert idea as in the praise of useful impersonal actions: that of fear of everything individual. — Friedrich Nietzsche

If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich would have kept it all to themselves. — Lane Kirkland

The bottom line is simple: all of us deserve to make the most of our potential as we see fit, to be the masters of our own destinies. Being forced to sell these things away to survive is tragic and humiliating. We don’t have to live like this. ― CrimethInc

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] punkisundead 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why should the bus drivers care about the judges ruling?

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Because then they can "legally" get thrown in prison for long enough to turn their family homeless who don't have savings, which if they are striking for fair wages, is the case for many.

[–] punkisundead 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Legally that might be possible, but surely the solidarity between the bus drivers and the general population would be able to overcome that, wouldnt it?

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago

No, that only works if the entire population overthrows the police force. Otherwise they will just rot in jail being abused by the class traitor psychos that are police.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think you know how the Dutch legal system works.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ignore all those speculating, this is not the US.

A striking bus driver might not care, though it could be considered stealing and land him in legal trouble or be fired.

But it's mainly the unions that coordinate these strikes. They cannot on a large scale organise illegal strikes without large repercussions.

In general, striking is well protected in the Netherlands. For example, companies are not allowed to hire strikebreakers or to fire people for striking. When a judge decides that free bus rides isn't an allowed method of striking, these protections don't apply either.

[–] punkisundead 5 points 5 months ago

So its more the unions that need to be careful and since there (currently) is not really an alternative for bus drivers to organize themselves and start collective action, the bus drivers are restricted by what the union can legally do. Pretty similar situation in Germany.

I think strikes should break laws if the ones striling think it might help them.

[–] stabby_cicada 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And this is why Food Not Bombs refuses to ask for permits before feeding the hungry or holding demonstrations. If the government authorizes you to protest, the government holds authority over your protests.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because pigs categorize people into two categories:

Law abiding (does what they're told) and Enemy (has no rights)

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're thinking about the US. In my country, cops are usually well aware of people's rights.