this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
37 points (91.1% liked)
literature.cafe chat
393 readers
1 users here now
Local off topic chat for literature.cafe, any and all are welcome. For discussions of books and beyond! Please follow instance rules. Although focused for literature.cafe users, any and all are welcome!
To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's just not the same for cognitive development and engagement.
Skimming headlines, occasional (short ) articles, and reading pithy comments is vastly different from sustained reading of a single text.
The first is what my dopamine-seeking ADHD slips into multiple times daily as I procrastinate doing my work; the light "popcorn" reading I'm doing is intellectually engaging, on some level, but it's also further fueling my atrophying attention span. And I'm almost exclusively getting surface-level, easily shared ideas that lack nuance.
Actually sitting down and focusing on a text, even if it's a pulp fiction story, works the brain in different ways, requiring sustained attention and deeper comprehension on whatever topic we're reading about (or more involved stories).
So, yes. You're right. Many still are reading a lot. But not reading books is still a huge problem for our society.
And I'm glad that I do both; reading is my primary source of entertainment, professional development, and personal growth. I just hope I'm successful in raising both my kiddos to be readers. (1 of 2, so far, but the youngest is only 6...)
And I think it's time to get off Lemmy and get back to my book.
Also reading long form texts is relatively boring endevour. The proliferation of short form text, audio, video and images athropies our ability to endure the state of boredom.
In my belief, boredom is really important for human beings as it enables us to spring us to action and bring more emotional awareness.