this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
141 points (91.7% liked)

News

23259 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Call of Duty? REALLY? The other two are maybe something (still seems like grasping at straws) but a video game?

My heart goes out to the families for what they went through but this doesn't seem like it solves anything...

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree.

I was taken aback by this level of CoD: MW2 as many others were:

https://www.ign.com/articles/how-no-russian-became-call-of-dutys-most-memorable-mission-art-of-the-level

It was such a morality issue that came up. I simply didn't expect it to be in the series. It made me not fire like I normally would. I felt so uncomfortable and guilty being there. It just shows that it's the person not the game.

[–] DaDragon@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And maybe that was the point of that mission. To cause you to think about the violence that you normally included upon your virtual enemies without a second thought. If you play a FPS game, you won’t question why you’re shooting the other team, you just do it. The same way it doesn’t technically matter why the crowd of people in said COD level are your enemies. What matters is the developer telling you to shoot them.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, that definitely was their intention... to make you stop and think about your actions. They gave you a choice.

I believe they even give you an achievement for NOT shooting anyone in that scene. Unfortunately, I shot a couple innocents before realizing what was happening.

The first time I played it, I just figured it was just a messed up level. But then I thought about it and wondered why they included it. Totally changed my opinion.

If some conservative parent who doesn't normally play videogames were handed that without context, they'd be all for banning the thing. And yet they wouldn't realize it was teaching you a lesson.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's about Activision's role in marketing the weapon to make money, not about the game or video game violence. It's not as cut and dry as I first thought, either.