this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
237 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

48003 readers
1128 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ve seen them. I understand them. I’m correct.

Not making their sources generally available for download is NOT the same as closed source. The only ones subject to their new licensing agreements are their paying customers. They are very much pushing against the spirit of FOSS licenses but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First they came for...

Nah, nevermind. You'll understand soon.

[–] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think you are talking to a very different person than you actually are.

Not making their sources generally available for download is NOT the same as closed source. The only ones subject to their new licensing agreements are their paying customers. They are very much pushing against the spirit of FOSS licenses but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

But how would that Joe look at the source code if it not publicly available and he's not a paying customer?

Checkmate.

[–] muddybulldog@mylemmy.win 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Joe hasn’t been provided the binaries from RedHat they’re under no obligation to provide the sources.

And the true sources can easily be obtained from the upstream, same place every other bistro provider get’s them.