this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
527 points (98.3% liked)

News

23301 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 188 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Thanks for the 4 years tuition though!

I could see them barring them from walking for their degree, but to hold it completely is messed up. Bullshit that ‘the corporation’ overruled the faculty vote.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 70 points 5 months ago

And that's why nobody should ever go to a fot-profit school.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The fun thing is that people say "I graduated" or "I'm graduating" but it's technically more correct to say "I am being graduated (by the university)." I might be mixing it up a bit, but the idea is that the university always has the final say over whether or not you get that important piece of paper at the end.

One of my teachers in high school taught us this, but I never actually thought I'd see it in action. It's cruel.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Which is bullshit. If you got the grades and paid your tuition, a university should not be able to withhold your degree. They can ban you from the graduation ceremony, but that's it.

It is crazy that a university hold such power over someone.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Harvard doesn't give grades. You either pass, fail, or pass with honors, more or less entirely at the whim of your professors.

It's much more of a social club than a school, and being denied a degree is more akin to having your country club membership revoked than your credentials refuted.

It's almost pro-forma, as the real benefit of attending Harvard is rubbing shoulders with the children of billionaires. The goal is to find someone willing to become your financial patron, not to hold a piece of paper confirming that you did all your homework.

If these kids are on the outs with the school board, they've already been blacklisted by anyone that matters.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Headline is misleading. The article notes that they arent necessarily withholding them permanently, but because they are going through the disciplinary process, and so currently not in good standing, they can't get them at graduation.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Similar to Israel telling Palestinians that they can't have a state "right now" and have to come to "agreeable" terms first.

If there is no term given it means permanently.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

But they did "give the terms": they are not in good standing right now, and when the disciplinary action is complete then a final decision will be made.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As long as the students are not allowed to graduate the headline remains correct.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It might be technically correct because bar does not necessarily mean permanently, but it implies that, and your claim that it means permanent is definitely false, especially if you're basing it on the logic you used to claim it's permanent.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Technically are permanently barred unless overturned. But the title never used the word permanent.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Technically are permanently barred unless overturned.

The articles notes that they are not in good standing because they are in the process of disciplinary action. So considering this is not a ruling against them that needs to be overturned. If you have some kind of evidence otherwise, I would like to see it.