this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
30 points (96.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40157 readers
458 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Good day self-hosters! I'm not exactly sure what to call what I'm looking for besides a "clipboard". Let me describe my problem and what my ideal solution is.

At work, I get a lot of slack DMs that ask for the same information. It's not consistent to the point I would just pin the information in my Windows 11 clipboard. But it's often enough that I'd prefer to give people the same information each time it's asked.

I'm limited in what I can build on my work computer. In an ideal world, I'd do what Gilfoyle did and make and bot but I lack the time and skills for such a task. Right now, I solve this with a very long notepad, which is subject to copy/paste errors. If I don't highlight everything correctly or if I accidentally copy over an existing line. That kind of thing.

What I was thinking was a very simple website where the items I'm copying are in tiles that can be tagged and searched. Once I find what I'm looking for, I can click the button to copy it to my clipboard and then go on with my life.

Due to restrictions on my work computer, I cannot host containers or host a website, though a fully self-contained HTML page with javascript I could do.. Ideally this is something that can be build using Github Pages build with Jekyll but so far, I haven't found a theme that mimics the behavior I'm looking for and I lack the time (though not the skills) to build it.

I'd prefer the github route so that I can share the page with others on my team who get asked similar questions.

I am also able to deploy a website via Github Pages (with .nojekyll).

I have to think something similar to this already exists but I imagine the restrictions on having no backend might be the challenge. Love to hear your thoughts!

Edit: added context for Gilfoyle

Thank you all for the great suggestions. I should have added in this post that my work does not allow software with Copyleft (Don't get me started. I'm a strong copyleft advocate and it annoys me that my company only takes and never gives back to OSS). I'm going to give TiddlyWiki out. License is friendly with my work, seems simple enough to run.

That said, Logseq seems to be pretty interesting as well. Might try this out on my on machine to see if I like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psycobob@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It may be overkill but I use Logseq for notes. It uses a local git repository to manage changes. I have a hook setup to push to a GitHub repo when it does.

It just produces markdown files so you can dig through them without the app installed if you like.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Logseq seems very interesting. It looks similar to "OneNote" in terms of overall approach but open source. The main issue my company would have is that the license is AGPL. My company refuses to use any license that includes Copyleft.

[–] redbr64@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just curious, what's their reasoning?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably the notion that they'd be required to release proprietary code. I never heard a reason as to why we can't use software with copyleft. Just that we can't.

[–] redbr64@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ah, that's the only thing I was thinking of, but it surely didn't sound like you trying to develop a product on top of it haha