this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
96 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5249 readers
463 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
96
We’re letting Trump distract us from his corrupt, anti-climate agenda | There is a strange, substantive vacuum in this campaign cycle. (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 6 months ago by silence7 to c/climate
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There is a strange, substantive vacuum in this campaign cycle.

There have been for every presidential election from the 1980 one onward.

Is it even worse now? Yes. Is it only or even mainly the fault of the Mango Mussolini? Far from it!

The mainstream media, including WaPo, could ignore him every time he says anything not directly related to policy priorities and the world would be much better for it.

Particularly because he would almost certainly lose if they did that and we'd only have to suffer 4 more years of Biden rather than the end of democracy as we know it.

That's not as profitable for the billionaire-owned media, through 😮‍💨