this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
138 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8573 readers
321 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago

idk... I feel like Valve might be the one with the power to stop this already with refunds. It sucks for them, since they'll lose their cut of the sale, but if they refund thousands of copies at full price, it adds a financial disincentive for publishers.

If Valve made it a policy to automatically refund games to anyone who asks after DRM is added, that might help encourage more users to request refunds, so publishers might be less inclined to add Linux-breaking DRM (good for Valve), and get more goodwill from gamers, but it will also cost Valve more in fees, and encourage publisher pushback against Steam's perceived monopoly.

I have no way to speculate which of those incentives is more important for Valve.