this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
77 points (88.9% liked)
Degrowth
782 readers
1 users here now
Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I probably agree with this, but I have no idea what it's trying to say.
The caterpillar is non-renewable energies. It's doing good and growing, but it can't keep on eating and shitting forever because poop will accumulate and resources will run out.
The caterpillar needs to transform to a butterfly (renewable energy) to keep on living.
Except that butterflies don't actually eat anything and die after a couple of weeks.
[citation needed]
Really depends on the species.
But the caterpillar poop is fertilizer for new plants who'll grow up better, so in this case it would be renewable energy?
It says it's explaining economics, though, not climate change.
"cringe intensifies"