this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
381 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4303 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago (2 children)

While I am sure it is a thing that happens, I hope you'll excuse me if I don't hold my breath waiting for Mr. 10 Strikes to get his turn.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Trump wants to be locked up. He has the tweets ready to go. Unfair, biased against him, did nothing wrong, silenced, caged, election interference, crying like a toddler as though everything isn't entirely his own fault, as though he hasn't been given, and taken, every advantage and benefit. He wants his legions of acolytes to take to the streets, demanding his freedom. He wants to raise funds with it. He wants the publicity to attract pro-bono lawyers to replace the ones who have quit for various reasons. He wants to sue and use pending litigation to further stall all court cases against him.

And the Judge knows this.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Fuck what he wants. I want to see that orange turd.suffer consequences for his actions. Let the crazies be crazy...like they're NOT going to to those things anyway?

[–] Monstera@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Give him 320h of community service collecting trash

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

I can't wait for a judge to rule that being at a Trump rally fits that definition

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I'd like that a lot. I do wonder if they issue orange colored adult diapers to match the jumpsuit.

It will be really tough to try to pull off a stupid bad-boy image like that GD mugshot where he's posing with a practiced pose (whoever took the mugshot should have never cooperated and found the most pathetic and least-flattering picture instead) if he's out picking up trash by the side of the highway.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

He cannot pick up himself. He is out of his preferred age range.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree completely, but I do think we should be prepared. As the wise philosopher once said, "In the game of chess, you can never let your adversary see your pieces."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I think the National Guard should be prepared in such an instance. Just let the magabrained try something like J6 again. These gaslighters have been clutching their pearls over Ashli Babbitt; seems like many of them are just dying to have many more instances of Ashli. Next time around, I hope the adults let them have their wish. Maybe they will finally get the freaking message.

[–] comador@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of all that, it still would be a victory for the integrity of the legal system and the people to see Orange Man in an orange jumper on the front page news.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I feel like it would be a balm to the majority of people to see him finally actually get consequences for his actions rather than just threats that he keeps ignoring. But the justice system and politicians are afraid of that noisy, mostly white minority that is allegedly armed and claims to be willing to use force.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Of course letting him run free, facing no consequences at all for flagrantly breaking the law and ignoring court orders means that he and his rabid followers are harmless, right?

He might have contingency plans for when he goes to jail, but that doesn't mean he should remain free of consequences.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I don't want that. I want him in jail. I just know that he wants it, too, and while I want him to stay there, I know he won't until he's convicted and sentenced.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I like what I've seen others suggest. Community service. Send him to the must run down soup kitchen and make him clean the dishes.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

They don't let you do things that actually help the community. You just smack weeds with a dull McLeod somewhere the public won't spot you.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s not ten strikes, it’s two. Although there were ten violations, there have been only two hearings. At the first, Trump was fined the state maximum and reminded that he could face jail time for further infractions. At the second hearing, Merchan fined Trump the state maximum, and after having expressed his disinterest in jailing a former President, he then stated that further violations would result in jail time. That’s the reason Trump has been so quiet this week.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/05/10/the-week-that-muzzled-trump-00157439

Merchan is doing the right thing by following standard practice. He’s careful not to give the defense any justification to appeal his rulings based on bias. He wants his rulings to stick just as much as we all do.