this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3084 readers
81 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He should spend the money sacking the HomeOffice teams and replacing them with actually competent people that can process claims quickly and efficiently.

[–] scrchngwsl@feddit.uk 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly, if their claims were processed faster and more competently (i.e. with very low likelihood of successful appeal), then the ones who are not genuine asylum seekers can be deported legally and quickly, which is surely a greater deterrent than the Rwanda scheme.

Am I just a naive lefty? What am I missing?

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're asking for a competent government.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A competent government is not actually a hard thing to achieve. The problem is you're assuming that the Conservatives are just incompetent, and while a great deal of them are, the issue is far more that they just don't want to process the asylums. They want this to be a problem, that way they can rail against the evil terrible foreign people which is what they think their voter base wants.

This is a Conservative manufactured problem. They have no interest in processing asylums quickly, being slow and ineffective is the intention. It's not a failing.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

It's more than that in the UK, unfortunately. Suella Braverman's father ran British concentration camps in Kenya, she's trying to restart the family business (funded entirely by the taxpayer), the reason they haven't been processing people is simply so they have enough occupants for their new camps.

[–] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The majority of the civil service don't support those policies. It's not their fault that every now and then some crazy unelected "CEO" comes along and tells the directorate "now do this". In the last ten years the Home Secretary changed eight times!

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

Most civil servants are good (for government workers) but the Home Office has been stacked with people by all the vile Home Secretaries the Tories have had over the last 14 years. Sacking them is prudent.