this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
19 points (60.9% liked)

Technology

59106 readers
3944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Browsing the web I came across this (meta) search engine. From the first glance, it seems promising and giving quite a good results to my searches. Definitely better than Google, Bing or DDG, which tend to be full of SEO/ads/AI bullshit these days. Does anyone use it?

It somehow implies it's open source and indeed there is github https://github.com/PresearchOfficial too, but I can't find any link from the presearch.com itself to it. It's just... IDK, weird?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 83 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I'm immediately suspicious of anything that says "earn crypto rewards" so that's a "no" from me.

I just use Searx-NG as my meta search engine, and it's been pretty good.

There's another self-hosted actual search engine (with its own dataset + crawler) but I forget its name off the top of my head. I've been looking into setting that up to experiment with.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Same, anything peddling crypto and implying the user may earn it through no actual work being done, is suspicious.

Searx-NG works well enough for me in 90% of cases, may not be perfect yet but if it keeps getting developed it will get better. I love those random redirectors that send you to a random instance, no centralised site you depend on then.

[–] applepie@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

I think the work here is sharing your search history lol

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are you thinking of Stract? https://stract.com/

I don't self host, I use it as an option in Searx.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 6 months ago

Yep! Wish I'd have seen your reply before digging though old posts to find that lol.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is that remotely feasible on a homelab? What kind of bandwidth/storage would you need to run this thing and keep it up to date?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, I am sorry, I have no idea. As I said I only use it through Searx

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, that crypto part must be new(ish). I remember it definitely wasn't there about half year ago when I first find out presearch. I believe it had no account to create either.

Well, I'll give SearXNG another chance I assume.

[–] totallynotaspy@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lol it was there, I used to use it during the pandemic and the earning for each search thing was def there in 2020.

They might not make it as obvious anymore though

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

My bad, did not notice it before. It could not be this visible, though, right?

[–] inconspicuouscolon@lemy.lol 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Unrelated, but I've never seen someone use the word "assume" that way before. It technically works, I think?

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, the best I can do is hope. I'm not a native speaker and my english lessons are long gone, so I put words here and there as they came to my mind hoping the other side will understand... Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.

[–] inconspicuouscolon@lemy.lol 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hey cool! I'm native and I still don't always know if the way I'm talking is correct, but nobody really cares. If they do and take issue with it, it's not worth worrying about.

As a native speaker, I read it as:

I haven't given it much thought, but there's a good chance I'll give it a shot.

It's a bit awkward, but I skipped over it and grasped what I assume was the intended meaning, so it's fine. Better words would be "suppose" or "guess" in this context.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

YaCy?

There’s also another SearX-like one called websurfx - albeit still in its early days.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 6 months ago

I've heard of that one recently, but the one I was thinking of was Stract. Had to search through a few communities to find it because I'm a genius who didn't bookmark it lol.