this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

Out of the loop

10949 readers
2 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I keep hearing about layoffs, studios being closed and how the industry is troubled. Are companies losing money and sales are poor, or is it the same as Google and other companies laying off people just to pump their stock price and make money despite profitability?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 33 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It appears to me that most of the layoffs are from publishers of AAA games. Perhaps it is too hard for AAA game development to be sustainable. Too high costs and not always good return on investments.

Starfield showed us that bigger is not better.

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 11 points 6 months ago

Yeah I feel like it's similar to movies in a way. You can only push so much money and development into something before you start seeing diminishing returns.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago

It isn't just AAA by a longshot. Indie devs are also going through hell.

Part of it is that a lot of companies overstaffed over the pandemic, finished up those projects they were behind on (there is a reason Winter 23/24 has been INSANE), and are now laying people off.

But mostly it is because of economic uncertainty and inflation. Investors are a lot less willing to throw dump trucks of cash at people. That leads to wary investors/shareholders for the large companies and a "need" to punish labor for management's mistakes. And for indie devs that means an inability to get funding.

Danny O'Dwyer and NoClip have been making a game for the past few years to better understand what development is. And they put up a REALLY good video where Danny talks about what goes into a pitch for a publisher and just how incredibly bleak it is. Lots of "Well, at least this one person told me they weren't interested rather than just ghosting us" vibes.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I really like smaller, focused games. I don't need a game to be every genre, and I don't need to sink over 100 hours into it. I'd rather play something like Celeste than yet another open world collectathon with observation towers to climb, crafting, shitty combat, boring story, bad minigames, and running back and forth again and again on mindless escort treks that exist solely to pad the game runtime. I'd rather spend $5-20 on a 4-10 hour game than $70 on a game that overstays its welcome in order to justify the pricetag.

Quality > quantity.