this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
51 points (90.5% liked)

New York Times gift articles

552 readers
44 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That makes no sense.

My taking issue with oversimplification, doesn't mean I'm advocating for less thought to be put into the matter.

It means the opposite.

We can do better than simply "how much has this been processed" which is just another word for "preparation".

"Ultraprocessed" makes it seem like the act of preparing the food somehow ruins it, when the real problem is all the other differences between industrially prepared food vs how you'd turn individual "unprocessed" ingredients into a meal, cookies, or whatever else at home.

A bowl of noodles consumed in a restaurant, or prepared by you yourself, would be classified exactly the same as a bowl of sodium-overloaded instant ones, because the classification has literally nothing to do with what the food actually contains, merely how far removed it is from a raw ingredient.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What is the gain that you seek from this fight ?

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That people become more informed?

It's better than nothing if people are thinking about whether something they buy is "ultraprocessed".

But even better than that is if people know how to identify food that has been prepared in a way that is sane, or if it has been produced specifically to exploit bad consumer habits.

It's not a fight. My main goal is literally just to put information where people might read it.