this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
237 points (84.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
217 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    237
    I respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful project (slrpnk.net)
    submitted 6 months ago by tsugu to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Snap doesn't really even have as many applications packaged as people think. Snap's package count is often touted as being much higher than Flatpak's. However, this is misleading, as Snap allows the inclusion of many command-line interface (CLI) only packages that aren't well-suited for containerization.
    The inclusion of these CLI-only packages drastically inflates Snap's overall package count, while Flatpak does not include as many standalone CLI tools.
    Furthermore, packaging CLI tools as Snap or Flatpak packages doesn't really make much sense. A huge amount of CLI tools were never intended to be used inside a containerized environment like Snap. As a result, there will likely be compatibility issues and unsupported edge cases.
    Additionally, there are already established universal packaging standards for CLI tools, such as Nix and Homebrew. These packaging systems are better suited for distributing standalone CLI applications compared to containerized formats like Snap and Flatpak.