149
submitted 1 month ago by Vodulas@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

Ford and GM are probably regretting that switch to NACS...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
[-] Chimaeratorian@beehaw.org 4 points 4 weeks ago

This is bad for us too, because cars were already being developed with NACS since CCS “lost the war” in the US. What kind of uptake will those cars have with a network that has completely stopped growing because manbaby decided to take his toys and go home?

The auto manufacturers will blame everything but the fact that most EVs are overpriced and overcomplicated to compensate for them being ultra-reliable and no longer in need of constant maintenance. This country already killed EVs once, don’t put it past capitalism to try a second time.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 4 weeks ago

The good news is that NACS is being adopted as an SAE standard (J3400), so further development is outside Tesla.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

If the Tesla Network fails then anyone with a Tesla plug will just buy an adapter to whatever standard does take over.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

J1772 is great for home charging, but for charging on road trips you really need CCS or NACS. The good news is NACS is being adopted as an SAE standard (J3400)

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37211 readers
466 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS