this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
793 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12313 readers
458 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I live in a place where ID isn't required. In fact, I can register there without ID. It's really nice, and voter fraud is quite minimal despite this

.

Los Angeles California

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Needing ID is a brand new idea for british conservative party. Its been in place since last local elections (a year ago?), and yeah it is a stupid idea that solely disenfranchises people

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Agreed, and probably the main aim of the change. It forces people to have a photo ID when they wouldn't necessarily otherwise.

I don't know if this is the case in other countries, but in the UK if you don't drive and don't require a passport then you wouldn't naturally have a photo ID. Forcing people to choose between "volunteering" all their personal data and being allowed to vote is not an action of a benevolent democratic government.