The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

One seen doing it spontaneously in nature might be more significant.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 22 points 6 months ago

Nah, I've never been in the monkey house chewing ginger roots, they know this stuff, or work it out, not sure which really.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

The difference might be in primates in captivity learning from humans using tools around them all day every day. Primate see primate do trial and error.

I don't get it. I highly doubt zookeepers tend to pick medicinal plants from the habitats in lieu of popping a painkiller. Otherwise how would using a shovel teach a monkey to use plants to treat a scratch for example?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who is using medicinal plants from the ape enclosure in a zoo setting?

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't mean it that literally. I mean just observing swaths of people putting straws into drinks, putting ointments on scrapes, etc might make them extrapolate and try similar actions using what's available to them.

It's not much of a reach for a primate seeing a human manipulate and dig with a shovel, and use that as inspiration to manipulate a bamboo shoot to scratch their own back.

We homosapiens spent 180,000 ish years wandering around in the dirt like idiots before it occurred to some of us that we could grow food in one place, thus beginning the path to civilization. Even we need examples to extrapolate from.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

Monke see; monke do.