this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
801 points (92.3% liked)

Science Memes

10923 readers
2491 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/18256270

Don’t upvote this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What separates a placebo from an anti-meme?

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Picture an image with an explanation of said image written on it. That's the anti-meme.

It becomes an anti-meme, by "misunderstanding" the fundamental nature of memes. Like explaining what is happening on the image, instead of reframing it with new text.

Now picture any random image, with any random text. That's the placebo.

A placebo-meme is something that doesn't have any intent of being funny, in fact it has no way of becoming funny (other then trough irony). So yes, those 2017 memes are not placebos, because an inside-joke was already in place, making them "funny" for the intended audiance.

With the current state of memes it became hard to actually construct a placebo, since anything not even remotely funny, something containing absolutely no trace of humor could still be picked up as a "senseless joke".

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.