this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
449 points (97.7% liked)

World News

32083 readers
886 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 43 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't care who it is, they give the information, then authorities verify it. If it comes up verified, there you go.

[–] Mountaineer@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is how you end up with police making up an "anonymous tip" which allows them to gain a warrant and dig through the personal possessions of anyone they don't like.

The problem isn't solve with anonymity, but by actually protecting the whistle blowers.

[–] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 18 points 4 months ago

The authorities should be able to dig through the possessions of massive companies that are fucking up so bad that planes fall out of the sky.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sometimes you can't verify things though

[–] AlexanderESmith@kbin.social 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then it still doesn't matter. If an identified source gives information that isn't verifiable, it's still not actionable.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Look! Another Boeing fell from the sky!

-verified

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

We already have enough evidence to verify a lot of the horrible things that has happened at these two companies. So what you wrote might be true in some situations, but it has nothing to do with the issue at hand.