this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
394 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
2873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  1. Does AWOL mean something other than "Absent without leave"? Cuz that's a weird way to describe a computer algorithm.

  2. ...aight so I'm definitely not a theologist, but... according to christianity, or catholocism specifically... is there actually any rule against using gatorade for a baptism? I'd assume it just says "water", but there's water in gatorade. Sure there's also other shit in gatorade, but there's other shit in tap water too. Even distilled water isn't going to be 100% pure.

And if gatorade's cool, where do they draw the line? Could you baptize a baby with honey? Or drop a steak onto the kid's face (there's water in those too!). Does it even have to be liquid water? Like what if you just threw some icecubes at the kid, or blasted some steam in its face??

So many questions!

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not just any water, it's holy water. If a priest has cast Ceremony to create the holy water on whatever, sure. But why when you probably have liquid water tk hand? God might wonder if it's very sincere if you're just basically doing it for a laugh. Might take away your spell slots.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Would that make them Oathbreaker Priests? Do they get special abilities for that?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

is there actually any rule against using gatorade for a baptism?

It's better, cuz it's got electrolytes.

Does it even have to be liquid water?

So like, ice X at 60 gigapascals and -120 °C?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s better, cuz it’s got electrolytes.

It's what souls crave!

So like, ice X at 60 gigapascals and -120 °C?

What's the worse that could happen?

[–] bomberesque1@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

What's the worse that could happen?

Freezer burn yo baby

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@Sterile_Technique
Not catholic, so I don't know their official position, but as I understand, in extreme circumstances any liquid will do.
Part of it involves the idea of "washing", or "being washed", so solid water or water in solids would not count. And also the idea of purification, but many use dirty river water.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

the idea of “washing”, or “being washed”, so solid water or water in solids would not count.

You could make a solid (HA!) argument for exfoliative or percussive removal of debris from the kid's head via scraping or knocking the nasty-bits free via the holy projectiles.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There was a picture going around during the pandemic of a religious leader performing a baptism with a super soaker. So, at least in some Christian denominations, that's totally cool. And if Gatorade is okay...

Can you baptize people with a supersoaker full of piss?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

"That's not piss."

- Alter boy

[–] emzili@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To answer your first question, AWOL is also used colloquially to describe people wildly or destructively ignoring the responsibilities of their job. So it'd be an apt descriptor if it was talking about a REAL priest but in this case it's just flowery wording (presumably for alliteration)

[–] Sizzler 6 points 6 months ago

Think rogue would be a better descriptor.

[–] Vrijgezelopkamers@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I think the writer meant to say 'gone rogue' instead of 'AWOL'. Just poor writing skills.