this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
568 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17392 readers
11 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We thought the rider fell off or something and it was going to crash. Then it turned and kept mowing. Park Roomba!

Another picture:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 47 points 6 months ago (4 children)

This is what people should be fearing. Studies have shown that when immigrants come in and “take jobs”, they pay taxes, and buy goods to create a life here, effectively replacing the job they took (since we need people who make beds for them to sleep in, food for them to eat, etc).

This is automation that’s ACTUALLY taking our jobs. This automation doesn’t pay taxes, and doesn’t replace the job it takes.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Very true, but let's also keep in mind that automation doesn't have to be a social evil. If our economic and political systems were better oriented toward lifting up society's disadvantaged and keeping extreme individual/family wealth in check, automation could benefit all. With better social safety nets (or a UBI), government-sponsored job training (perhaps paid for by taxes on automation), and incentives for starting small businesses, automation could mean less human drudgery in the workforce, and more efficient economic outcomes for all.

I'm not optimistic about that given our track record as a species, but it's possible.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

TL;DR: automated production is good if and only if the people own the means.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If we can fight the owners to keep our shitty back breaking jobs and win, we should have fought the owners to rebuild our economy for automation profits to largely benefit the people from the bottom up.

If we the peasant masses even can win against the tiny owner class oligarchs, lets fight for the right thing. And if we can't win, well then it's all masturbation anyway and they'll do what they want.

It's irrational to fight for "we demand to continue to break our backs making your shit instead of robots so we can continue to subsist on menial laborer wages with broken backs!" in any event. That's some coal miner excuse for logic.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately the system has laid the framework for it to destroy itself when automation becomes ubiquitous. Imagine if y2k was inevitable but the engineers who's jobs it was to fix it hands were tied by the software company's forcing them to install more and more bugged software.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

I wish you were wrong, but unfortunately I think I agree with you.

[–] spez_@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't fear this. Automate EVERYTHING NOW

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Speak for yourself. I still want to jerk off manually.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Switches jerk off machine from auto to manual.

100% let's do this.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

You sure the automation doesn’t pay taxes…?

[–] dandroid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I have heard an idea floated around that the companies that make these types of automation devices would pay massive taxes on them, and that tax would pay for UBI. I'm not sure how the math works, but to me that sounds like the ultimate endgame. Then we can all enjoy our lives without needing to do tedious or backbreaking work.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Absolutely it’s the best way forward. The catch is that it’s hard to calculate. If I write an app that saves someone 3 minutes of each work day, how much am I taxed on what I automated? We can just tax the rich, and assume they automate away everyone’s jobs.